> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • America's Favorite Charities
  • Nonprofits and the Trump Agenda
  • Impact Stories Hub
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Advice
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Here’s a Grant Maker That Wants to Pay Your Indirect Costs. Really.

By  Drew Lindsay
October 26, 2016
A Grant Maker Who Wants to Pay Your Indirect Costs. Really.

The six-page request for grant proposals looks fairly standard. It asks for a “short and punchy” summary along with budget data and related information. But page two offers something surprising: a robust discussion of the perils of underfunded nonprofits, topped with the instruction, “Please ensure that your indirect costs are fully covered.”

These words are part of the application the Hewlett Foundation put together for organizations seeking funding from its Madison Initiative, a three-year, $50 million effort to reduce partisanship in Congress. Daniel Stid, director of the Madison program, hopes the language signals that Hewlett is committed to paying the true cost of grantees’ work.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 571-540-8070 or cophelp@philanthropy.com

A Grant Maker Who Wants to Pay Your Indirect Costs. Really.

The six-page request for grant proposals looks fairly standard. It asks for a “short and punchy” summary along with budget data and related information. But page two offers something surprising: a robust discussion of the perils of underfunded nonprofits, topped with the instruction, “Please ensure that your indirect costs are fully covered.”

These words are part of the application the Hewlett Foundation put together for organizations seeking funding from its Madison Initiative, a three-year, $50 million effort to reduce partisanship in Congress. Daniel Stid, director of the Madison program, hopes the language signals that Hewlett is committed to paying the true cost of grantees’ work.

Just as important, he hopes nonprofits see it as an invitation to be candid and give accurate estimates of their indirect costs, not low-ball estimates.

“We will pay whatever it is,” he says, “but if you don’t ask for it, we can’t pay it.”

Hewlett has long favored awarding general operating support and generously covering overhead expenses on project grants, Mr. Stid says: “Eroding the capacity of grantees is just a bad thing. It’s not our style.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When the Madison Initiative began in 2014, groups aiming to strengthen representative democracy often received only project-based grants that coincided with the two-year Congressional-election cycle, the program chief says. He has focused Madison grants more on long-term funding, with 60 percent of the money awarded in 2016 supporting general operations.

On project grants, Mr. Stid wants proposals to include full numbers for indirect expenses. The application itself links to a free toolkitdeveloped by the Bridgespan Group, a philanthropic consultancy, to help grantees calculate overhead costs.

But Mr. Stid also wants to persuade groups to be candid, which he says is not easy. He says leaders of two organizations that are outspoken about full funding submitted grant requests with suspiciously low indirect-cost estimates – one at 10 percent of the grant, another at 15 percent.

“I went back to both of them and said, ‘Really, guys?’ ” He says the applicants quickly came back with revised numbers.

Hopefully, Mr. Stid says, the language in the Madison grant proposal will convince all applicants to present true costs without such a nudge. “We’re trying to explicitly give people permission.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Read an excerpt of the Hewlett Foundation’s grant application.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Grant Seeking
Drew Lindsay
Drew is a longtime magazine writer and editor who joined the Chronicle of Philanthropy in 2014.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2026 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin